Inside-Out

The world today is suffering with unbalanced mind power growing expeditiously at the cost of spiritual strength. The human evolution so far is the expression of a whole, a Trinity of body, mind and soul. A powerful mind requires a ‘more’ (or let’s just say ‘an equally’) powerful spirit to guide it. The deficit of it, is the manifestation of destructive science instead of a constructive science (a science with a heart), we are more or less seeing today. In such times of imbalance, the Cosmic Spirit finds a necessity to express itself through humans and that is the reason for rising Kundalini/Cosmic Awakenings within thousands of people today. It’s an expression to reinstate balance in the world, to usher in Spiritual Power tantamount to the Mind Power. This author too had one such Awakening in 2012, but in hindsight she sees that the journey started in 2008 itself. She would like to share her spiritual journey with people, for the Cosmic Wisdom feels a necessity to express itself and be propagated for a collective benefit. This book Inside-Out is a journal of her personal notes presented in the same time sequence of the journey - of how her pain culminated in peace. There is no story in it. The notes are not connected in any intentional manner. It is a discrete set of analyses of things that happened around her, as she made this journey. It is a set of many small stories, very similar to the way we live in this world. We are all part of a bigger story, have been spawned out of it and are weaving our own stories. And living in the little bubble worlds of our own stories, we are weaving the bigger story back. . . . . . The absence of any of the constituents in the whole leads to imbalance and the history says every entity tries to restore balance to itself. Now, that goes to say when the balance in this world is out of place, the Trinity executes itself to balance the world. Now that boils down to the Million Dollar Question, is the "balance" in the world out of place? Well, definitely there's lot of change ever since the dawn of mankind as "we" know it, till far, which period we might fit into the word 'era', ‘eon’, ‘epoch’ or whatever, depending on the jargon used to represent the longevity of time. The era as it started has changed a lot by now, people have changed a lot, the social instinct and responsiveness varied a lot over different periods of the era, few people have forgotten the roots but again there have been enough number of people who kept trying to reinstate and reinforce the roots. So there is change, well large change, but there is still enough scope, enough space, wherein the balance can be sustained further. I mean the wisdom, knowledge and technology are still in-tact to balance the good and the bad. Don't you think we are equipped enough, with how much ever little scope we have, to make that little large enough to sustain the world further? My answer is a definite YES! Human kind has seen a lot of events - lot of battles, revolutions, civilizations and many more. They all can be viewed as mere serendepity - a fortunate series of events that still kept the World in tact or even can be viewed as tapestry - a series of events associated with a sublime plan - the Divine plan to keep the World in tact. It is upto us which lens we use to look at it, but the fact is that the Destiny has had in it that the World is in tact so far. As we progress in time, the sublime plot, if any, unleashes itself as tapestry and serendipity intertwine in destiny divine... . . . . . But frankly the knowledge of all this and the right/wrong interpretation thereoff is no solace. Altruism is not easy to embrace especially when there is no outlet. People around you don't need it! Given a choice, I would prefer naivete to altruism, the bliss of ignorance to wisdom, how much ever small, of altruism and a finite set of colors to the purity of whiteness. I'd really like to believe that purity is elusive atleast for a human, at this current juncture of the world, for the bitterness of altruism just shows in the fact that altruistic God Himself is accepted by people through the filters of their faith and beliefs instead of the fact that He is God. I really wonder if this earth has become such an ungodly place that God is unwilling to establish His true identity. The bitter fact is that purity has no audience until it refracts. . . . . . But then any observation is in accordance with science if it is repeatable. Can scientists repeat this situation as and when they want under prescribed experiment conditions? Only then, can this discovery be deemed to be a beginning point enough towards a long journey. The mere discovery of God particle being the key to explore the mysteries of universe seems only an exaggeration when scientists can't make public how they plan to unravel those mysteries. This is not a confidential piece of information and the mankind deserves to be apprised of this, because it is our earth which we inhabit, that they are experimenting with. There is non-sense and there is common-sense and then there is science to reason both. Surely, there will be some God sense too which will interrupt if and when this experimentation is fatalistic to the mankind. Will time tell or will science tell?